By Alan Caruba
September 19th was an anniversary you did not read
or hear about in the nation’s news media. It marked six years—2008—since the
first permit application for the construction of the Keystone XL pipeline was
submitted to the federal government. Can you imagine how many jobs its
construction would have created during a period of recovery from the 2008
financial crisis? President Obama is universally credited with delaying
it.
Thomas Pyle, the president of the
American Energy Alliance, pointed out that World War II, the construction of the
Hoover Dam, and the Lewis and Clark Expedition all took place in less time. In a
September Forbes article, he noted that “Earlier this year a Washington Post/ABC
News poll found that 65 percent of Americans support building the pipeline,
while only 22 percent oppose it. In Washington three-to-one margins are usually
referred to as mandates.”
In contrast, in March 2013 the
then-Interior Secretary of the Interior, Ken Salazar, boasted “In just over four
years, we have advanced 17 wind, solar, and geothermal projects on our public
lands.” It is not these projects that
Americans depend upon for energy. The opposite is a stark explanation why coal,
oil, natural gas and nuclear energy remain the heart blood of the
economy.
The Daily
Caller reported in July that the “U.S. Bureau of Land Management is
currently sitting on a backlog of 3,500 applications that need approval to move
forward on drilling for oil and natural gas on federal land,” just part of
Obama’s war on U.S. energy.
According to the U.S. Energy
Information Administration, fossil fuels met 82% of U.S. energy demand in 2013.
Petroleum, primarily used for
transportation, supplied 36% of the energy demand in 2013. Natural gas
represented 27%. Coal represented 20% and generated almost 40% of all
electricity. In the six years since Obama took office that is a loss of 10%!
The much ballyhooed “renewable
sources” of energy, justified by the false claim that carbon dioxide emissions
are causing global warming or climate change, are a very small part of the
nation’s power providers. Wind power represented 1.6% and solar power
represented three-tenths of 1%! Hydropower supplied 2.6% making it the largest
source of so-called renewable energy.
Politically, it has been Democrats
advocating renewable sources and siding with the President’s delay of the oil
pipeline and the Environmental Protection Agency’s assault on coal-fired plants
to produce electricity. By contrast, the Republican-controlled House of
Representatives has been busy putting forth legislation to fix aspects of our
energy problems and needs.
Some of the bills that were introduced
included H.R. 2728: The Protecting State’s Rights to Promote American Energy
Security Act; H.R. 3: The Northern Route Approval Act (regarding the keystone XL
Pipeline; H.R. 1900: The Natural Gas Pipeline Permitting Reform Act; H.R. 2201:
The North American Energy Infrastructure Act; and H.R. 6: The Domestic
Prosperity and Global Freedom Act, intended to expedite the export of liquefied
natural gas to our allies around the world. The global market is growing at a
colossal pace.
These bills will likely all die in the
U.S. Senate, controlled by the Democratic Party. The Nov 4 midterm elections can
change that if enough Republicans are elected to gain
control.
It’s not just natural gas that is
helping the economy improve. The Financial Times reported in late September that
“The U.S. is overtaking Saudi Arabia to become the world’s largest producer of
liquid petroleum, in a sign of how its booming oil production has reshaped the
energy sector.” Why? “The U.S. industry has been transformed by the shale
revolution, with advances in the techniques of hydraulic fracturing and
horizontal drilling enabling the exploitation of oilfields, particularly in
Texas and North Dakota.”
The only places you won’t find oil
drilling are on federally controlled lands. The same holds for coal and natural
gas.
This is in keeping with a virtual war
on U.S. energy waged from the White House. Consider what we have
witnessed:
# Obama has refused to let the
Keystone XL pipeline be built.
# Billions wasted on loans to
renewable energy companies, many of which like Solyndra and Solar Trust of
America went bankrupt.
# Obama made electric cars like the
Chevy Volt part of his energy policy, providing subsidies but their high cost
and low mileage capacity has resulted in few sales.
# Obama and the EPA advocated a
cap-and-trade tax on greenhouse gas emissions when there has been no global
warming for 19 years and carbon dioxide plays no role whatever in the Earth’s
climate.
# The Obama administration terminating
the construction of a nuclear waste repository at Yucca Mountain in Nevada
despite nearly $15 billion already spent on this necessary
repository.
These are just a few examples, but in
the meantime, the U.S. still requires that a valuable food commodity, corn, be
turned into ethanol, an automotive fuel additive, that (a) reduces the millage
in every gallon and (b) increases its cost at the pump. As Seldon B. Graham,
Jr., a longtime energy industry consultant and observer, notes that “Ethanol
production peaked in 2011 at 6% of total oil demand.” Favoring replacing
imported foreign oil with American oil, Graham says “Americans would have saved
$64.7 billion on the oil price since 2009.”
Americans are afflicted by a President
and his administration that for political and environmental reasons are costing
them trillions in needless, senseless energy costs, loans and subsidies, and
efforts to impose laws that have no basis whatever in science.
© Alan Caruba, 2014