By Alan Caruba
If you
want to know what a carbon tax on emissions of carbon dioxide (CO2) would do to
America you need only look at the destruction of industry and business in
Australia, along with the soaring costs for energy use it imposes on anyone
there.
“The carbon tax is contributing to a
record number of firms going to the wall with thousands of employees being laid
off and companies forced to close factories that have stood for generations”,
Steve Lewis and Phil Jacob reported in a March 18 issue of The
Daily Telegraph, a leading Australian newspaper.
“Soaring energy bills caused by the
government’s climate change scheme have been called ‘the straw that broke the
camel’s back’ by company executives and corporate rescue doctors who are trying
to save ailing firms.”
The
passage of a carbon tax in America would have the exact same results and it
remains a top priority for the White House and Democrats in Congress who see it
as a bonanza in new funding for the government.
As Paul
Driessen says in a Townhall.com
commentary, “More rational analysis reveals that dreams of growth are
nothing more than dangerous tax revenue hallucinations. They would bring intense
pain for no climate or economic gain.”
Too
many Americans still believe that CO2 is causing global warming, but CO2 plays
no role in climate change and is barely 0.038 percent of the Earth’s atmosphere.
More to the point, there is no warming and hasn’t been for the last seventeen
years as the Earth is in a natural cooling cycle that has prolonged the advent
of spring with severe snow storms throughout the nation.
There
is no scientific justification for such a tax, but those advocating it don’t
care about the science. They care about raising revenue for an ever-growing
government to spend and waste.
Driessen points out that
“Hydrocarbons (coal, oil, and natural gas) provide over 83% of all the energy
that powers America. A carbon tax would put a hefty surcharge on everything we
make, grow, ship, eat, and do. It would put the federal government in control
of, not just one-sixth of the economy, as under Obamacare, but 100% of our
economy and lives. It would make the United States increasingly less productive,
less competitive globally, less able to provide opportunities for our
children.”
The
case for a carbon tax simply doesn’t exist, but there are powerful forces in
Congress and the support of the White House to impose such a tax. The power of
the environmental movement and its long history of lies about the climate,
primarily the global warming hoax, cannot be dismissed or
ignored.
In
Australia, “The Australian
Securities & Investments Commission reports there were 10,632 company
collapses for the 12 months to March 1—averaging 886 a month—with the number of
firms being placed in administration more than 12 percent higher than during the
global financial crisis.” It represents “a record high…led by widespread
failures in manufacturing and construction, which accounted for almost one-fifth
of collapses.”
Greg
Evans, the chief economic economist for the Australian Chamber of Commerce and
Industry, said that “It defies logic to adopt a policy which even the Treasury
acknowledges will lower our standards of living and be harmful to national
productivity.” Adding to Australia’s struggling companies, the carbon tax and
one on mining were showing up as “sovereign issues” in discussions with foreign
investors.” Who would want to invest in Australia if these two taxes were
destroying the economic strength of the nation?
Politics in Australia is no less a
battleground than here in America. Australia’s Prime Minister, Julia Gillard,
who introduced the carbon tax, just beat back a bid by her Labor Party’s
dissidents to reinstall former leader Kevin Rudd who lost to her in 2010 and
2012. Much of the opposition to her comes from the harm being inflicted by the
carbon and mining taxes.
Marlo Lewis is a senior fellow in energy and environmental policy at the
Competitive Enterprise Institute.
During the 2012 campaign, he described a carbon tax as “political poison
for the Republican Party.” Mitt Romney opposed it, but ‘the
big attraction of carbon taxes these days is not as a global warming policy but
as a revenue enhancer. In both parties, deficit hawks and big spenders (often
the same individuals) are flailing for ways to boost federal
revenue.”
That is precisely the problem
afflicting a nation whose Congress and President could not find a reason to cut
anything from the federal budget. The result was the “sequestration” that
imposed cuts neither party could agree upon.
In a Fox News article,
“Here comes Team Obama’s carbon tax”. Phil Kerpen, president of American
Commitment and author of “Democracy Denied” reported that “The Treasury
Department’s Office of Environment and Energy has finally begun to turn over
documents about its preparations for a carbon tax in response to transparency
warrior Chris Horner’s Freedom of Information Act request. The documents provide
solid evidence that the Obama administration and its allies in Congress have
every intention of implementing a carbon tax if we fail to stop
them.”
President Obama’s nominee to be the next Secretary
of Energy, Ernest Moniz, is on record wanting to double or triple the cost
of energy, much as his predecessor wanted. A carbon tax, if enacted,
would totally undermine a nation that has a debt climbing toward $17 trillion
and millions unemployed in an economy that is struggling to inch its way out of
the depths of the financial crisis.
If you wanted to destroy
America, you could do it with a carbon tax. Australia is reeling from the cost
to its economy and the higher energy costs its people are paying. We don’t want
that here.
© Alan
Caruba, 2013
No comments:
Post a Comment