By Alan
Caruba
Americans are obsessed with fat;
either with eating it or being it. We’ve been told that we’re too fat and we’re
told that eating fat is bad for you.
Being fat is your own business. You’ll feel better if you lose a few pounds, but you will enjoy your next meal if it has a fat content rather than being a bland cereal…which explains why so many cereals today have some surgery covering or content.
Being fat is your own business. You’ll feel better if you lose a few pounds, but you will enjoy your next meal if it has a fat content rather than being a bland cereal…which explains why so many cereals today have some surgery covering or content.
The fact is you can eat almost
anything you like and remain a healthy weight if you just don’t eat too much of
it. It’s not rocket science.
For politicians, however, controlling
what we eat has become an obsession. A demented Democratic Representative, Rosa
DeLauro, from Connecticut, has proposed a bill—the Sugar-Sweetened Beverages Tax
Act—SWEET for short, that would penalize people one-cent for every teaspoon of
sugar used in their drink of choice. It’s none of her business, let along the
government’s, what you want to drink.
This obsession with what we eat has
been personified by First Lady Michelle Obama who championed the 2010 Healthy,
Hunger-Free Kinds Act that overhauled nutrition standards affecting more than
thirty million children in schools around the nation.
It authorized the U.S. Department of
Agriculture to set standards for all food and beverages sold during the school
day. The law includes vending machines, snack cards, and daytime fundraisers.
That now means that campus bake sales, the most popular fundraiser, now has to
pay heed to a federal law that forbids selling cakes, cupcakes, or
cookies.
Laws like this are a perfect example
of how intrusive into the ordinary lives of Americans of all ages are laws that
are slowly killing the concept of personal choice and personal freedom. They
also demonstrate how wrong such laws are when they are written and passed by
people who are clueless about nutrition.
A recent Gallup
poll on “consumption habits” revealed that “Nearly twice as many Americans
say they are actively trying to avoid fat in their diet (56%) as say they are
actively avoiding carbohydrates (29%). However, fewer Americans are avoiding fat
now more than a decade ago.”
Over the years as a book reviewer and
avid reader, I have read “You Must Eat Meat” by Max Ernest Jutte, MD and Frank
Murray, and “The Cholesterol Delusion” by Ernest N. Curtis, MD. Both books
authoritatively debunk what Americans have repeatedly been told about meat and
cholesterol, but my earliest advisor on these and other food related topics was
Rebecca Caruba, my Mother, who taught gourmet cooking
for three decades in local adult schools and who authored two cookbooks. She was
a keen student of nutrition and early on warned students against margarine,
telling them to use real butter and to enjoy all manner of meats, cheeses, and
other foods we are constantly told are not good for
us.
At this point I want to add Nina
Teicholz to the list of heroes like my Mother and the authors of the two books
mentioned above. A skilled journalist, she has written a 479-page book,
“The Big Fat Surprise: Why Butter, Meat, and Cheese Belong in a Healthy
Diet” ($28.99, Simon & Schuster). The fact that it includes
nearly 140 pages of tiny, single-spaced notes regarding every detail in the book
tells you why it took some nine years to write it.
Simply stated, everything Americans
think they know about our diets is wrong, the result of a deliberate campaign to
convince us that eating fat is bad for us when, in fact, creamy cheeses and
sizzling steaks are the key to reversing the obesity, diabetes, and heart
disease that affect too many Americans.
As William Davis, MD, author of “Wheat
Belly: Lose the Wheat, Lose the Weight and Find Your Path Back to Health” said,
“A page-turner story of science gone wrong…Misstep by misstep, blunder by
blunder by blunder, Teicholz recounts the statistical cherry-picking, political
finagling, and pseudoscientific bully that brought us to yet another of the
biggest mistakes in health and nutrition, the low-fat and low-saturated fat myth
for heart health.”
The myth began in the 1950s with Ancel
Benjamin Keys, a biologist and pathologist at the University of Minnesota. He
was searching for the causes of heart disease. The nation was extremely fearful
about it and the heart attack that President Eisenhower had while in office only
added to their fears. Keys concluded that cholesterol was a major factor, but as
Teicholz points out “It is a vital component of every cell membrane, controlling
what goes in and out of the cell. It is responsible for the metabolism of sex
hormones and is found at its highest concentration in the brain.”
Keys and other researchers, however,
noting that cholesterol was the primary component of atherosclerotic plaques,
assumed it to be “one of the main culprits in the development of coronary
disease…This vivid and seemingly intuitive idea,” says Teicholz, “has stayed
with us, even as the science has shown this characterization to be a highly
simplistic and even inaccurate picture of the problem.” Keys would devote his
life to advocating his misinterpretation of cholesterol and
fat.
The problem with the word “fat” is
that it has two very different meanings. One is the fat we eat and the other is
the fat on our bodies. A book worth reading is “Fat: It’s Not What You Think” by
Connie Leas, published in 2008 by Prometheus Books. As Ms. Teicholz notes, “A
large number of experiments have since confirmed that restricting fat does
nothing to slim people down (quite the reverse, actually), yet even so, the idea
that there could be such a thing as ‘slimming fat’ will probably always seem to
us like an oxymoron.”
I know that few will read Ms. Teicholz
book, but you will surely welcome knowing that “saturated fat has not been demonstrated to lead to an
increased risk of heart attacks for the great majority of people, and even the
narrowing of the arteries has not been shown to predict a heart
attack.”
The problem for all of us is that the
American Heart Association and the National Institutes of Health both adopted
the incorrect analysis of Keys et all, institutionalizing the diet-heart
hypothesis and thus are setting the nutrition agenda.
My Mother cooked the most wonderful
meals every day and more so on Sundays. She lived to 98 and my Father to 93,
eating all manner of meat dishes along with fish and other choices. We all ate
cheeses with gusto. And, yes, we loved pasta and Mother’s fabulous home baked
breads and desserts. I am coming up soon on age 77 and my diet reflects what
kept them alive and disease-free for all of their years.
If you or someone you know is
seriously obsessed with their weight and health, recommend “The Big Fat
Surprise” to them. I recommend it to you!
© Alan Caruba, 2014
No comments:
Post a Comment