By Alan
Caruba
“What’s
in worse shape””, asked the Heartland Institute’s Director of Communications, Jim
Lakely, in a January 11th blog post. “The state of the Earth’s
climate? Or the state of the New York Times? Global temperatures are not rising
all that quickly, so the Earth is doing fine. Meanwhile, the Old Gray Lady is
shutting down its Environmental Desk.”
TheHeartland Institute has cause to
celebrate because it has led the effort to debunk the global warming hoax,
sponsoring international conferences that brought together the world’s leading
scientists and others to demonstrate how specious the alleged “science” of
global warming was and is. It did so in the face of a United Nations agenda to
advance the hoax and a compliant and cooperative media that did nothing to
dispute it.
In the
interest of full disclosure, I have been an unpaid policy advisor to The
Heartland Institute for many years, only once receiving a small grant many years
ago to help fund research involving the global warming hoax. These days
donations to my blog help sustain the effort.
As the
planet enters its seventeenth year in which temperatures have been steadily
falling in response to a natural cooling cycle, the result of reduced solar
radiation, the global warming hoax is finally being revealed as an instrument of
the United Nations and individual governments, including our own, to impose
“carbon taxes” that would raise billions of dollars for everyone
involved.
The New
York Times with its vaunted reputation has been suffering the same fate as many
daily newspapers in the U.S., as well as news magazines such as Newsweek and
Time. The rise of the Internet has bled off advertising revenue, but I maintain
that as alternative sources of information became available, the Times and the
mainstream media has suffered a loss of credibility across the spectrum of news
topics.
In the
case of the Times, however, their journalistic sins were much worse than others
because it led the global warming hoax from its beginning, never failing to fill
its pages about rising sea levels (they’re not rising precipitously), declining
polar bear populations (they’ve increased), and using every weather event from
hurricanes to tornadoes to droughts (all cyclical and natural) to shout about a
“global warming” caused by carbon dioxide and other “greenhouse gas emissions”
that had nothing whatever to do with a non-existent threat to the nation and the
planet.
Bluntly stated, the Times
lied about global warming—now called “climate change”—on a daily basis.
The
Times Environmental Desk had a team of editors and reporters that never lost an
opportunity to further the greatest hoax of the modern era and one can only hope
that reporters like Andrew Revkin will be reassigned to cover high school
football and soccer games in the tri-state area. On his Facebook page, Revkin
said he was never a fan of the desk even though he worked for it and lamented
the elimination of an environmental editor. It is doubtful, however, that the
Times will eliminate its editors and teams that cover the White House, Congress,
and other activities of interest to readers, including
sports.
Maybe
it was just serendipitous—the Times has been cutting back on staff for quite
some time now—but I believe the news that the poster boy of global warming, Al
Gore, had sold his television channel, Current, to al Jazeera, a notably
anti-American channel that gained fame broadcasting Osama bin Laden’s rants, was
the “final straw” that led to the decision to shut down its Environmental
Desk.
In a
January 11th Wall
Street Journal commentary, Holman W. Jenkins, Jr., wrote that “Mr. Gore and
his allies wore out their welcome with their exaggerations, their
self-righteousness, and their perfectly foolish insistence that a plurality of
voters could be morally bullied into giving up their self-interest if chastised
long and loudly enough by Mr. Gore.” His commentary took to task the lies of the
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) that extrapolated from
1.58% of the Earth surface—the lower 49 U.S. states—to suggest a global warming
phenomenon.
The
public did not rush to purchase electric cars, nor did they install expensive
solar panels on the roofs of their homes. Instead they worried about the price
of gasoline and the rising cost of electricity and other expenses whose costs
have been increased by extraordinary bad “environmental” laws and regulations
such as the requirement that ethanol be added to each gallon, increasing is cost
while decreasing mileage, and destroying the engines under the hoods of millions
of automobiles. As forty percent of the nation’s corn crop was siphoned off to
make ethanol the cost of most food items at the supermarket increased as
well.
The
good news is that there will not be an environmental editor or deputy
environmental editor at the Times, nor seven reporters whose sole job was to
report lies intended to advance and bolster the agenda of the Environmental
Protection Agency, NOAA, and the agendas of heavily funded environmental
organizations such as the Sierra Club, Friends of the Earth, and the World
Wildlife Federation.
The
“newspaper of record” has debased itself and the profession of journalism for
too long as a leading participant in the progressive movement’s effort to impose
socialism on the greatest example of the power of capitalism and the free
market—the United States—the world has ever known.
© Alan
Caruba, 2013
No comments:
Post a Comment